For a detailed description of architecture development in the context of enterprise architecture, see TOGAF 9.1, Part II Architecture Development Method.
Description
| Name1 | Architecture development | ||||||||||||
| Domain | |||||||||||||
| Target Outcome | Predictable costs, efforts and impacts of the intervention/implementation part of Regulative Interactions. | ||||||||||||
| Social actors and roles | Architects | ||||||||||||
| Trigger or preceding interaction | Requirements statement or gap analysis (gap between the actual and desired state); diagnosis part of of Regulative Interactions | ||||||||||||
| Interfaces and services | The rendering of architecture models to support understanding by stakeholders of the architecture decisions (and their implications on the life cycle of work system (providing services). | ||||||||||||
| Inputs and outputs | input: non-architectural inputs, pre-existing models or descriptions | ||||||||||||
| Stores and tools |
Regarding Content that is Accurate and Reliable, this will be part of Repository for partnerships (wikiworx). Drawing board, architecture description tools, repositories |
||||||||||||
| Other characteristics |
|
||||||||||||
| Further reading | ref: Source (for enterprise architecture): TOGAF 9.1, Part II Architecture Development Method; See also TOGAF 8, Chapter 3. |
- Questions, answers, comments
- "Architecture development" among the interactions
- All interactions
- All events
- On the template
-
Semiotic Interactions
- Architecture development
- Citizen's Initiative Review
- Classification
- Creating a common vision
- Diagnosis
- Documentation
- Fact Finding
- Feedback
- Knowledge Conversion
- Monitoring
- Ontology
- Planning
- Presentation
- Requirements debate
-
Review
-
2030 Agenda Review Framework
- Global Review
- #NFUR00 - National follow up and review - #asd79
- #NFUR01 - Preparation of a national SDG Report
- #NFUR02 - Fostering mutual accountability
- #NFUR03 - Coordination and collaboration among government agencies and ministries
- #NFUR04 - Inclusive national policy dialogue
- #NFUR05 - Coordination by the national statistical office
- #NFUR06 - Facilitating comparability
- #NFUR07 - Capacity development
- Regional Review
- Thematic Review
- Voluntary National Review
- Voluntary Stakeholder Reporting - #2030VSR
- Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review - #QCPR
-
2030 Agenda Review Framework
-
All Interactions
- Life Cycle interactions
- Regulative Interactions
-
Semiotic Interactions
- Architecture development
- Citizen's Initiative Review
- Classification
- Creating a common vision
- Diagnosis
- Documentation
- Fact Finding
- Feedback
- Knowledge Conversion
- Monitoring
- Ontology
- Planning
- Presentation
- Requirements debate
-
Review
-
2030 Agenda Review Framework
- Global Review
- #NFUR00 - National follow up and review - #asd79
- #NFUR01 - Preparation of a national SDG Report
- #NFUR02 - Fostering mutual accountability
- #NFUR03 - Coordination and collaboration among government agencies and ministries
- #NFUR04 - Inclusive national policy dialogue
- #NFUR05 - Coordination by the national statistical office
- #NFUR06 - Facilitating comparability
- #NFUR07 - Capacity development
- Regional Review
- Thematic Review
- Voluntary National Review
- Voluntary Stakeholder Reporting - #2030VSR
- Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review - #QCPR
-
2030 Agenda Review Framework
- Techno-commercial Interactions
- Territorial Interactions
Because interactions are defined or described as patterns, their realization will require the involvement of entities or continuants: pattern ''parameters'' are bound to entities in the so-called real site work system (see the figure at Regulative Cycle), and bind:
- roles to macro or meso-level actors (stakeholders) in a country, a city, or to pico, micro or meso-level actors (stakeholders) in a sector;
- resources to resources (entities) accessible to the actors (stakeholders), for instance information available in the languages mastered by them (language options in the entity dictionary). Note that existing resource gaps for many stakeholders may make problematic the achievement of the intended interaction ''outcome'', or it may distort the cost-benefit equation.
Moreover, interactions can be bound together in variable ways, to create variants and achieve fit of the interaction to the situation, as indicated in the occurrent binding options. The Multisystemic therapy's First Principle (Finding the Fit) and the supporting distinction between the treatment model and the evidence-based treatment clarifies the utility of the variant creation.
Generalization is used with the meaning explained in Generalizations (Geometric) (Wikipedia).